#374: The Best Of 2022

My favorite three articles and my favorite interview of the year

Loyal Readers, it’s that time of year again. Let’s reveal the best articles and interviews of the past year, shall we? But before the unveiling, two quick things:

  1. Thank you for another great year. Together we discussed 10 phenomenal articles, interviewed 10 talented authors, and published 50 issues that included more than 150 oustanding pieces on race, education, and culture. ⭐️

  2. Want to be inducted into The Highlighter Hall of Fame? Here are my favorite articles over the past five years. Several went on to win Pulitzers and Kirkus awards. One became the title essay of The 1619 Project. I challenge you to read all of them and then tell me which one is your all-time favorite.

OK, are you ready for this year’s winners? (And: Can you predict them?)

Here we go: I’m really pleased with this year’s winners. The selection process was rigorous. After scanning all 150 pieces, I chose 11 semifinalists, reread them all, and then narrowed the list down to the best of the best. They’re outstanding, and I hope you enjoy (re)reading them. If you’re moved, I’d love to hear which one is your favorite.

A happy break and holiday to you. See you in the New Year! I’m taking two weeks off, back Jan. 5. And one more time: Thank you for your readership.

1️⃣ A Kingdom From Dust

Ever had a Cutie? 🍊 Or a bottle of Fiji water? Or a glass of pomegranate juice?

Maybe you prefer nuts — like maybe almonds? Or pistachios, perhaps?

If you answered yes to any of those questions, you support the empire of billionaires Stewart and Lynda Resnick, the king and queen of California agriculture, who control not only hundreds of thousands of acres of land, but also billions of gallons of water every year, not to mention the livelihoods of thousands of mostly undocumented people who work in their vast fields and live in their company town.

I deeply appreciated this article (and so did many of you) because of what I learned about my home state – namely, how much power its big farmers wield, how little power its farmworkers possess, how messed up its water policies are, and how our desire for delicious produce in the supermarket is influencing climate change, contributing to wildfires, and literally making the land underneath our feet sink.

This article has it all. Not only will you meet the Resnicks, but you’ll also learn about how they schemed their way to the top, stealing water to protect themselves from drought; how they built a company town, keeping their laborers dependent on philanthropy; and how they destroyed the environment, planting trees where they don’t grow and ripping out trees where they do.

And if you step back, as Mr. Arax encourages us to do, you’ll realize how fragile California is, and how dire our situation is — how we’ve managed to construct an enormous agricultural apparatus because of people’s ambitions for fortune, one that the country depends on, but one that fundamentally does not work, and one that will inevitably fail sooner rather than later.

After all, no matter how strong California dreaming is, there’s just no escaping the reality that 40 million people are living in a desert that’s getting drier.

➡️ Click here to read the article (89 mins)

2️⃣ Monuments To The Unthinkable

Clint Smith: “It is impossible for any memorial to slavery to capture its full horror, or for any memorial to the Holocaust to express the full humanity of the victims. No stone in the ground can make up for a life. No museum can bring back millions of people. It cannot be done, and yet we must try to honor those lives, and to account for this history, as best we can. It is the very act of attempting to remember that becomes the most powerful memorial of all.”

I deeply appreciated this article for a number of reasons, including:

  • Dr. Smith acknowledges that Germany did not immediately build monuments after World War II and explores the current debate among Germans that their accounting of the past is merely performative.

  • When Dr. Smith takes you to Berlin’s Grunewald Station or walks past a Stolperstein or visits the Memorial of the Murdered Jews of Europe, he makes sure to pause, reflect, and bring his experience to you.

  • He emphasizes that people, not governments, construct memory and memorials. He writes, “Germany’s most powerful monuments did not begin as state-sanctioned projects, but emerged — and are still emerging — from ordinary people outside the government who pushed the country to be honest about its past. Americans do not have to, and should not, wait for the government to find its conscience.” (55 min)

➡️ Read the article

3️⃣ Unspeakable Pain: What Doctors Don’t Hear

When Lina María Ferreira Cabeza-Vanegas goes to serve as a volunteer medical interpreter in a free clinic in Chicago, her trainer says, “Remember, you are not really there. Never, ever, add a single word to what is said. That is not your job.” Prof. Ferreira Cabeza-Vanegas wants to follow the rules. But an interaction between an insensitive doctor and a frightened patient (who looks “just like and nothing like me”) prompts her to go off script. (14 min)

Some articles shout out “Pick me for best-of!” This one was quieter, more subtle. The writing’s power and the piece’s nuance deepened with each re-read.

+ Content warning: This article includes a discussion of a suicide attempt.

➡️ Read the article

4️⃣ An interview with Mitchell S. Jackson, author of “Looking for Clarence Thomas”

I never forget how lucky I am to be doing Article Club. Not only have I met so many of you, and built a thoughtful reading community together, but I’ve also had the opportunity to interview the most talented authors out there. One of them is Mitchell S. Jackson — the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “Twelve Minutes and a Life” (last year’s Article of the Year). The interview that Sarai and I got to do with Mr. Mitchell was my favorite one of the year.

Mr. Jackson was kind and gracious from the start. He laughed that I insisted on calling him Mr. Jackson. And right from the first question, everything felt natural, like we were talking to a friend rather than to a famous writer whose prose is changing the canon (Sarai’s words, and I agree!) of longform nonfiction.

We talked about a number of topics, including:

  • how he didn’t want to write about Clarence Thomas at first

  • how his trip to Pin Point inspired the piece’s opening

  • how James Baldwin’s writing helped him understand Mr. Thomas, and

  • how Mr. Thomas is a man of deep contradictions, whose time on the Supreme Court has caused “dramatically malevolent things to wide swaths of Americans”

Most of all, though, Mr. Jackson talked about the craft of writing, how if he’s going to spend months on a feature story, he wants to push himself, he wants to break convention, he wants to do something new with form.

I’m very much concerned with the sentence. I’m almost concerned with the sentence over the story. And so the benefit of writing nonfiction is that, You don’t have to invent the scenes, but the kind of ethos of wanting to make beautiful sentences, that’s really what I want to do.

Thank you for another great year of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you appreciated the journey. Feel free to share your thoughts. I’d love to hear from you.

To our new subscriber Janet, I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Niowan! Nolan! Neelan!), you’re pretty great. Loyal reader Mik, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are two ways you can help out:

❤️ Become a paid subscriber, like Tammy and Jason (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (The hoodie is next!)

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next in the New Year on Thursday, Jan. 5, at 9:10 am PT!

#373: Why The Future Is Analog

Also: Wordle, T-Shirts, and can you predict the Article of the Year?

Hi there, Loyal Readers. Let’s get right to it by announcing the lucky winner of last week’s giveaway: The Highlighter T-shirt. It’s VIP Michele, not a stranger to prizes, but always gracious when she wins. Here’s her acceptance speech, which features her dog Licki Minaj. Congratulations Michele!

Let’s continue this season of giving with another prize: a 6-month digital subscription to the New York Times (for you or a friend to enjoy, after their strike is over). All you need to do is guess this year’s Article of the Year (which I’ve chosen already, stored in a lockbox, and will reveal next Thursday). Leave a comment with your guess. (Don’t let Michele win again.)

Leave a comment

All right, that’s enough with the festivities. Today’s a simple issue with just two recommendations. They’re on the shorter and lighter side this time, so feel free to read both in between holiday card writing and desperation gift shopping. The first, an ode to the analog world, comes at the perfect time — as ChatGPT mesmerizes us with its ability to write college essays. The second, a mathematical analysis of the game Wordle, will either pique your competitive interests or cause you to snub your nose at science. Please enjoy this week’s articles, and thank you again for being part of our reading community. ⭐️

1️⃣ Why The Future Is Analog

The pandemic ruined us for many reasons, argues author David Sax, in this excerpt from his new book, The Future Is Analog: How To Create a More Human World. Not only did it harm our mental health, and keep us cooped up in our homes, and dislodge our ability to interact with people. It also let digital win. We all know this, of course, as we say, over and over again, that we’re going to delete Twitter from our phones, or put our phone in another room when we’re sleeping, or stop checking texts when we’re hanging out with our kids. But what we don’t know, Mr. Sax argues, is that we will experience a shift back to the analog.

Look at a picture of a beautiful sunset on Instagram and you think “pretty.” Stand in front of it and watch the sun descend, feeling its rays on your face, and you get a sense of something bigger—your place in this universe.

I’m not sure I buy his argument, actually. Or maybe I’m just a cynic who thinks that AI will make us all cyborgs soon. But I’d rather wish for a world where people enjoy each other’s company in real time and space, rather than wonder what’s waiting for them, what’s buzzing for them, and what’s sending them notifications on a device that keeps them always halfway somewhere else. (12 min)

➡️ Read the article

Here’s loyal reader Len enjoying a warm beverage at his home in Old Orchard Beach, Maine. Reading is always better when you’re near a good mug.

2️⃣ The Math Behind Wordle Guesses

I try not to tell anyone that I play Wordle every morning at 5:35 am. But alas, I do. Ever since VIP Abby divulged her secret first word (no, I’m not going to tell you), I’ve been using it religiously, to mostly marvelous results. But Wordle statisticians would likely sneer at my first guess, suggesting that I go with “raise,” or the fan favorite, “adieu.” It turns out, though, that vowels matter less than well-placed consonants. This analysis of Wordle — which asks four questions, then provides mathematical answers — is my favorite write-up of the game I’ve read so far. If you’re a fan, you might pick up some tips. But I assure you, you won’t challenge my recent streak of birdies. (15 min)

➡️ Read the article

✍🏼 READER ANNOTATIONS: Several of you wrote in with appreciation for last week’s lead article, “Moments To The Unthinkable.” Loyal reader Xuan-Vu compared author Clint Smith’s writing with two of her favorites, Flannery O’Connor and William Faulkner. “I’m so glad you chose his work,” she wrote, and recommended Dr. Smith’s interview on NPR’s Fresh Air. Xuan-Vu adds, “[The podcast offered] so many thoughts for me to ponder on this topic, both inspiring and upsetting.” Thank you for sharing your perspective, Xuan-Vu. I invite all of you to reach out whenever an article moves you. All you need to do is hit reply or click here.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts. I’d love to hear from you.

To our 17 new subscribers – including John, Alina, and Lisa – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Mike! Manuel! Molly!), you’re pretty great. Loyal reader Liona, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are two ways you can help out:

❤️ Become a paid subscriber, like Joey and Kayla (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (The hoodie is next!)

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#372: Monuments To The Unthinkable

Remembering the past, reporting the reading wars, and saving your cat’s life

Welcome to December, loyal readers! Before anything else, I’d like to say happy birthday to my aunt Bernice, who turns 84 today. 🎂 An elementary school teacher for more than 40 years, she got me into teaching and reading, sharing with me her favorite book, Charlotte’s Web, when I was a kid. She’s been an inspiration to me all my life and a big supporter of all my reading-related pursuits, including this newsletter.

⭐️ Also: A warm welcome to our 24 new subscribers, including Sam, Irene and Kevin and Lindsey and Greg. I hope you find our reading community kind, thoughtful, and filled with tons of good articles to read and discuss. Loyal readers, if you like what we do here, please share The Highlighter Article Club with a friend. Thank you!

Share The Highlighter Article Club

All right, let’s get to this week’s selections. I’m leading today’s issue with “Monuments To The Unthinkable,” by Clint Smith. This is an exquisitely written, powerful essay about how Germany memorializes the sins of the Holocaust and what we can learn as Americans to come to terms with slavery and our shameful past. This piece is so good, you might be seeing it again in a couple weeks, when I reveal the four best articles of the year. I hope you make time to read it.

If history and public memory are not your thing, scroll down to find great articles on the latest salvo in the reading wars and whether you should get your pet cat a kidney transplant. Please enjoy!

1️⃣ Monuments To The Unthinkable

Clint Smith: “It is impossible for any memorial to slavery to capture its full horror, or for any memorial to the Holocaust to express the full humanity of the victims. No stone in the ground can make up for a life. No museum can bring back millions of people. It cannot be done, and yet we must try to honor those lives, and to account for this history, as best we can. It is the very act of attempting to remember that becomes the most powerful memorial of all.”

I deeply appreciated this article for a number of reasons, including:

  • Dr. Smith acknowledges that Germany did not immediately build monuments after World War II and explores the current debate among Germans that their accounting of the past is merely performative.

  • When Dr. Smith takes you to Berlin’s Grunewald Station or walks past a Stolperstein or visits the Memorial of the Murdered Jews of Europe, he makes sure to pause, reflect, and bring his experience to you.

  • He emphasizes that people, not governments, construct memory and memorials. He writes, “Germany’s most powerful monuments did not begin as state-sanctioned projects, but emerged — and are still emerging — from ordinary people outside the government who pushed the country to be honest about its past. Americans do not have to, and should not, wait for the government to find its conscience.”

➡️ Read the article

2️⃣ The Science Of Reading: Is The Reporting Biased?

I’ll be honest: Ever since the release of “Sold a Story,” Emily Hanford’s six-part podcast series about reading instruction, I’ve been turned off by the back-and-forth bashing between the phonics-first “Science of Reading” devotees and their many impassioned detractors. There have been Twitter fights; there have been open letters; there have been blog posts; there have been speeches. It’s the Reading Wars all over again. It’s tiring. Even though I care deeply about how to teach young people how to read, I’m steering clear of this fray. But I did find this critique by Prof. Maren Aukerman of the reporting on reading instruction very helpful. She doesn’t excoriate Ms. Hanford and Dana Goldstein (author of The Teacher Wars – she likes wars), but rather identifies how education journalists are exhibiting bias and sensationalizing a protagonist / antagonist conflict among adults when maybe we should be caring more about the kids. (13 min)

➡️ Read the article

3️⃣ How Much Would You Pay To Save Your Cat’s Life?

I’m personally more a dog person, and think Arlo is delightful, but I know many cat people (not necessarily “Cat People”), and one benefit of being a cat person is that you can prolong your cat’s life with a $15,000 kidney transplant. But should you? That’s the question Sarah Zhang answers in this funny-yet-serious article on the American trend of loving our pets (and investing in them) like our human children — especially among those of us who don’t have human children, an ever-growing group. Where’s the line between being a caring cat owner and doing too much? Is it maybe when you force another cat to give up their kidney for yours? (29 min)

➡️ Read the article

✍🏼 READER ANNOTATIONS: Loyal reader Jason generously shared his thoughts after reading “A Kingdom from Dust” and listening to my interview with author Mark Arax. Jason writes, “That article is beautiful in its multifaceted take on such a complex history and such a convoluted situation. The writing gets at the complexity of water politics and power in California, and extends that to acknowledging the complexity in people and in life. Beautiful stuff.” Jason, thank you very much for reading, listening, and sharing your perspective. It makes me happy that so many of you carve out time to go deep into these great articles on race, education, and culture.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts. I’d love to hear from you.

To our long-time subscribers (Len! Larry! Lester!), you’re pretty great. Loyal reader Kathleen, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are two ways you can help out:

❤️ Become a paid subscriber, like Linda and Cheryl (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (The hoodie is next!)

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#371: The Reading Mind

On this Thanksgiving: An ode to reading, Octavia E. Butler, and the pain of feedback

Happy Thanksgiving. Thank you for supporting me and this newsletter. Most of all, thank you for being loyal readers and for being part of our reading community.

Over the years, I’ve said many times: Reading by itself is not going to make our world a better place. But I do believe that reading is part of the journey. It’s a powerful act of introspection, compassion, and connection. Especially now, when corporations and institutions vie for every fraction of our attention, demanding that we scroll and click and reply with rage, the practice of reading teaches us stillness and reminds us to remain open to ideas and possibilities.

That’s what I’m hoping for here: that we take a few minutes each week to get away from the bustle, to read something beautiful and thought provoking, to reflect on how it resonates with us – and if we feel moved, to share our experience with a friend.

⭐️ I’d love to hear from you: What does reading do for you?

Leave a comment

1️⃣ The Reading Mind

“We were never meant to read,” says Prof. Maryanne Wolf in this fascinating conversation with Ezra Klein. There is nothing natural or genetic about it. But the invention of text 6,000 years ago, alongside the brain’s capacity to create novel neural networks, has fundamentally transformed the human experience.

But most of us, she argues, are no longer practicing the kind of deep reading that expands our minds. Instead, we’re skimming for information, usually on screens, rather than taking the time to allow for reading to achieve insight and epiphany.

Many of us have, if you will, regressed to that earliest form of reading in which we are barely skimming the surface of what we read, barely consolidating it in memory, and we are in fact reading less of what is there as a result.

The reason we have regressed, Prof. Wolf argues, is that how we read – and therefore, what we discern, what we comprehend – is determined by the medium on which text is delivered. On the one hand, the affordances of the digital medium support the consumption of voluminous amounts of information. Skimming and scrolling are effective defense mechanisms to help us get through the day. But they also limit our ability to infer, to take on perspectives, and to deduce truth.

The answer is not to flee from the digital world and abscond to a cabin in the woods of Montana where print books and newspapers and typewriters abound. Prof. Wolf suggests a more practical approach: carve out time for mindful reading, read differently based on our goals for the text, and make screens work for us (69 min).

➡️ Listen to the conversation & read the transcript | Listen on Apple Podcasts

2️⃣ The Spectacular Life Of Octavia E. Butler

Octavia E. Butler wanted to be a famous writer. So she manifested it into existence. “I shall be a bestselling writer,” she wrote in her journal. “This is my life. I write bestselling novels. My novels each travel up to the top of the bestseller lists and they reach the top and they stay on top. So be it! See to it!” In this beautifully written profile, the result of extensive research at The Huntington Library, E. Alex Jung reveals enchanting details of Ms. Butler’s extraordinary life. “I never bought into my invisibility or non-existence as a Black person,” she wrote in her journal. “As a female and as an African-American, I wrote myself into the world. I wrote myself into the present, the future, and the past.” (33 min)

➡️ Read the article

3️⃣ Thank You For Your Feedback

My last job had a culture of continuous improvement. When you did a thing, you had to ask for feedback, even if you didn’t want to hear it, and even if people didn’t want to give it. Sometimes the feedback was helpful. Other times it was not. I still remember the workshop I led about best practices for encouraging student inquiry in the classroom. “This event would have been better with hot cocoa,” one person wrote. This well-written article expands on the theme, exploring how requirements to include community input on government projects actually make our communities less equitable and less democratic. Author Aaron Gordon argues that if we really want to build housing and improve transportation, we should either limit input or change the format of public comment, eliminating shouting matches and finger pointing. (29 min)

➡️ Read the article

“One Yawn,” a triptych featuring Arlo, who belongs to me and loyal reader Peter. Want your pet to be highlighted here? hltr.co/pets

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts. I’d love to hear from you.

To our three new subscribers – including Bella and Hannah – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Kiara! Ken! Korey!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Joren, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are two ways you can help out:

❤️ Become a paid subscriber, like Lisa and Daniel (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (A new T-shirt is coming at HHH.)






📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#370: Saying Goodbye To My Chest

Pretty soon it’s Thanksgiving, so I’m appreciating you early for opening this newsletter Thursday after Thursday, for reading the articles, and for participating in Article Club. I’m grateful for our reading community.

This week I have three great articles for you. They’re about top surgery, school board shenanigans, and the downfall of college. If you have time to read just one piece, make it “Saying Goodbye To My Chest,” by Naomi Gordon-Loebl. In particular I recommend it if you identify as cisgender or have not had much experience with trans people or trans issues. As we’ve established over and over again, reading is never enough when we’re on a journey of learning and understanding. But it’s a good step toward empathy.

The other articles are great, too — especially if you’re a parent or an educator and you care about the future of public schools and higher education. Please enjoy, and I hope you have a great weekend coming up.

+ I’d love to hear from you! Feel free to let me know how you’re doing and which articles you’re appreciating. It’s easy: All you need to do is email me (if you want to keep things private) or leave a comment (if you want to shout it out to the world).

Leave a comment

1️⃣ Saying Goodbye To My Chest

Naomi Gordon-Loebl put on a binder for the first time when she was 14 years old. She liked how the white T-shirt fell against her flat chest. She loved the way she looked and felt. But only seven months ago, fully 20 years later, did Ms. Gordon-Loebl make the appointment for her top surgery. She explains:

I never hated my chest. It’s a perfectly fine chest; a good one, and I’m fond of it, even. It’s been with me for some 21 years. Everywhere my body has traveled, it has come along. Everything I have done, it has done too. It has been a part of me, and in some ways, it always will be. It needs to go now, not because it is wrong, or something worth despising, but simply because it is standing in the way of a life I can no longer postpone.

In this beautifully written account, Ms. Gordon-Loebl shares her journey and explains how she has felt being trans. It’s like “moving through a world where there are invisible rules” that she is always breaking. She writes about washing her hands quickly in the bathroom, getting patted down in the airport security line, and wanting desperately to sleep shirtless. “Sometimes I find myself idly imagining that what I am doing is returning my body to its rightful state,” she writes. (18 min)

Read the article

Gilly, who belongs to loyal reader Rebecca, enjoys squeezing into boxes and believes strongly that her belly attracts pets. Want your pet to appear here? hltr.co/pets

2️⃣ The Right-Wing Mothers Fuelling The School-Board Wars

You all know about the raucous school board meetings in which parents yell about Critical Race Theory, mask mandates, and books with gay and trans characters. But did you know about Moms for Liberty, the nonprofit organization behind all the fuss? I didn’t think I would appreciate this article, but once I met Robin Steenman, who led an effort in Tennessee claiming that teachers shouldn’t tell their students that male seahorses give birth (they do), I was hooked. The reason? Ms. Steenman doesn’t have kids in the district she despises. Turns out, neither do many of the moms. That doesn’t matter, though. The point is to infiltrate public schools as “joyful warriors.” Author Paige Williams writes, “Right-wing attacks on school boards are less about changing curricula than about undermining the entire public-school system, in the hope of privatizing education.” (40 min)

Read the article

3️⃣ How Higher Education Lost Its Shine

Back in the day, it was, Go to the best college you get into. Then it was, Go to the college that’s the best match for you – and be sure you can pay for it. Now, neither of those is true. More and more high school seniors are openly questioning the value of college, and fewer and fewer are attending. Inflation, rising college prices, and the pandemic have certainly contributed to the downturn, but the trend began in 2016, when 70 percent of graduates enrolled in college, an all-time high. By 2020, though, the rate had plummeted to 63 percent. This clearly written article explores the reasons young people are no longer as attracted to college as they used to be. The statistics might say that a college degree leads to better economic and health outcomes. But is it worth the money and stress? And isn’t the job at the local Volkswagen factory (or making TikTok videos) the safer way to go? (14 min)

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. I’d love to hear from you.

To our two new subscribers – Eli and Corey – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Janet! Jesse! Jay!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Kathleen, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are some ways you can help out:

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your appreciation of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Carla and Brad (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (A new T-shirt is coming at HHH.)

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#369: An interview with Eli Saslow, author of “An American Education”

Happy Thursday, loyal readers. This month at Article Club, we’ve been focusing on “An American Education,” by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Eli Saslow.

If you haven’t read the article yet, I highly encourage you to do so. It’s outstanding. It’s about how the superintendent of a school district in Bullhead City, Arizona, tries to deal with its severe teacher shortage by attracting top-notch educators from the Philippines. It’s also about one of those top-notch educators – Rose Jean Obreque – whose skills and optimism and high expectations and growth mindset unfortunately are no match for American middle school students and their shenanigans.

It’s a depressing story, no doubt, but it nonetheless tells the truth of what teachers and students are currently experiencing in schools across the country. I hope you’ll join us to discuss the article on November 20, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT on Zoom.

Sign up for the discussion!

I’m also very happy to share that I had the opportunity to interview Mr. Saslow yesterday about his brilliant article. We talked about a number of topics, including:

  • how writing the piece reaffirmed his deep respect and appreciation for teachers

  • how it felt to be in a chaotic classroom, especially as a parent

  • how of course it’s hard to recruit teachers when you’re paying them $38,000

  • how he approaches writing about what it’s like for people who are “in the swirl of our country’s biggest problems”

  • and yes, spoiler alert, that ending (wow)

I hope you take a listen and let me know what you think.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. I’d love to hear from you.

To our five new subscribers – including Chris, Daniel, and Rebecca – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Irene! Izzy! Isis!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Janet, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are some ways you can help out:

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

❤️ Become a paid subscriber for $3 a month, like Chris and Cal (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (A new T-shirt is coming at HHH.)

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your appreciation of the newsletter

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#368: Sold A Story

Welcome to November, loyal readers. I’m happy that last week’s article, “An American Education,” caused a buzz (especially among educators), and so before anything else, I want to make sure to invite you to our discussion on Sunday, Nov. 20.

You’re invited! You’re particularly invited if you’re a teacher or administrator or parent or if you’ve never joined an Article Club conversation before. I’m 115% sure you’ll find the people kind and the conversation thought provoking.

Sign up for the discussion!

All right, now that we have that out of the way, let’s get right to this week’s selection. It’s another piece on education (wow, two weeks in a row?), but instead of an article, I’m recommending a six-part podcast series. It’s called “Sold A Story.”

Listen to “Sold a Story”

It’s about reading instruction, my biggest passion in education. It’s by journalist Emily Hanford, whom I’ve interviewed (and about whom I have complicated feelings). It features John Corcoran, whom loyal reader Anne has interviewed for our podcast.

Subscribe to our podcast

It’s also abundantly popular right now. No fewer than 15 of you have sent the podcast my way. “Are you listening to this?” loyal reader Ben asked. “You have to listen to this,” loyal reader Jenn said. “I assume you’ve listened to this,” loyal reader Trevor wrote.

The answer is yes: I have listened. And I spent last Sunday re-listening to the first three episodes and taking notes. (The fourth episode comes out today.) Now I’m ready to share some of my thoughts, urge you to listen, and encourage you to get in on the conversation. Let’s go.

First, the gist: Ms. Hanford argues that the reason 65 percent of American children can’t read is that they’ve been taught wrong, and the reason they’ve been taught wrong is that teachers have been “sold a story” by culty reading gurus.

Second, a warning: Ms. Hanford likes splashy headlines. She’s not a journalist who looks for nuance. She likes holding power to account. Her body of work over the last five years demonstrates that she does not back down. Though I sometimes find her style bombastic, her argument is nevertheless compelling.

Ms. Hanford believes that reading research, which she calls “the science of reading,” has established that phonics instruction is the most effective way to teach young children how to decode words, and decoding words is the most effective way for young people to become skilled, fluent readers. Other methods of reading instruction — most notably “whole language” and “balanced literacy,” which remain popular today — do not work and are in fact harming children, Ms. Hanford argues.

Here’s a little bit more about each episode so far:

1️⃣ Episode 1: The Problem

The episode begins with two young kids reading. One is skilled and one is not. The struggling reader fumbles, stops and starts, skips words, and makes words up. It’s hard to listen to. Ms. Hanford points out that more than one-third of fourth graders sound like this when they read. Why? “I have an answer,” she says. It’s because one publishing company and four famous authors have deceived teachers for decades into believing that sounding out the words is not the best way to teach kids to read.

Good thing parents of dyslexic children caused a ruckus and started knocking on classroom doors to hold schools accountable. Otherwise, Ms. Hanford argues, nothing would have happened. We’d continue being OK with plummeting NAEP scores and dismal achievement among 82 percent of Black fourth graders. To be sure, the pandemic stunted young people’s academic growth. But it also offered an opportunity for parents to observe firsthand how their children were (not) learning to read. “I don’t blame teachers,” one parent says. But she made sure to tell Ms. Hanford.

2️⃣ Episode 2: The Idea

The second episode offers a detailed history of the whole language approach to reading instruction. In the 1940s, New Zealand graduate student Marie Clay designed a study to compare the moves of skilled vs. unskilled readers. She noticed that the best readers moved quickly through the words, not stopping at individual letters. This caused Ms. Clay to conclude that reading is natural for children and that focusing on words and literacy-rich environments was preferable to structured, pedantic lessons on phonics.

This progressive, Deweyan approach to reading instruction became immensely popular in the 1980s. Prof. Clay’s methods were central to Reading Recovery, a program that spread nationally to 49 states and tens of thousands of elementary schools. Prof. Clay was so influential, she was appointed a British dame in 1987. But at the height of her cult status, researchers using new fMRI technology were completing study after study that proved Prof. Clay’s theory wrong. Surely the science would win out, right?

3️⃣ Episode 3: The Battle

Not quite. Then came the battle, also known as “the reading wars.” Despite a barrage of research that established that the whole language approach was ineffective, Prof. Clay and her devotees — most famously Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell – stood by their beliefs and programs. “We cannot count on science,” Prof. Pinnell said at a 2005 conference, according to Ms. Hanford.

The controversy deepened as President George W. Bush launched his Reading First initiative in 2001 as part of No Child Left Behind. All of a sudden, reading became politicized. Republicans threw their weight behind phonics, while Democrats advocated for whole language and balanced literacy. The gloves came off. The tribes dug in their heels. Each side had their statistics and their culty leaders. And whenever someone wanted to introduce nuance into the conversation, an opponent was ready to call them a denier of science.

WANT TO SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS?

I’d love to hear them! Leave a comment below or email me at mark@highlighter.cc.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. I’d love to hear from you.

To our four new subscribers – including Aly and Anne – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Henry! Harry! Hope!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Isabel, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are some ways you can help out:

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

Subscribe

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your appreciation of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Bob and Bill (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes. (A new T-shirt is coming at HHH.)

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#367: An American Education

I have a love-hate relationship with education articles.

On the one hand, I love them. I’m an educator, after all. This is my 26th year in education. I like my new school in Oakland and its students and my colleagues. I appreciate reading articles on education because they hone my practice, challenge my perspective, and remind me why I’ve chosen my life’s work.

But education articles also get on my nerves. Sorry for being snooty, but they’re not always particularly well written. Even when they are, they often say the same thing: our kids can’t read, the pandemic scarred our children (duh), and teachers are quiet quitting and leaving the profession.

Given this complicated relationship, you may have noticed, especially if you’ve subscribed to the newsletter for a while, that I have featured fewer education-related articles lately than in previous years. But when I find an outstanding one, you can be sure I’m going to get it in front of you and encourage you all to read it.

That’s the case with this month’s Article Club selection, “An American Education.” Published in the Washington Post a few weeks ago, recommended by VIP Steven, and written by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Eli Saslow, the article explores how a rural school district in Arizona searches to find teachers to fill its classrooms. The answer is not to raise its $38,500 starting salary or to improve working conditions. The answer is to attract and outsource top-notch teachers from the Philippines.

If you’re an educator, you might be thinking, “I already know about this.” But you don’t know about it in the way Mr. Saslow shows us in his striking piece. He follows Filipina teacher Rose Jean Obreque all the way from landing in the Las Vegas Airport to arriving at her school in Bullhead City to standing in front of her eighth grade students, trying to teach them English.

Being in the classroom — this is the heart of the article. This is where Mr. Saslow’s writing shines: Here’s a snapshot of what he observes:

A boy was chewing on the collar of his shirt. A girl was taping pencils to each of her fingers and then pawing at the boy next to her. Two boys were playing a version of bumper cars with their desks. A girl was pouring water from a cup into another girl’s mouth, and that girl was spitting the water onto the student next to her. “Ugh, miss teacher lady? Can I go wash off this spit water?” the student asked. A boy was standing up and intentionally tripping over his friend’s legs. A girl was starting a game of hangman on the whiteboard. A boy was walking up to the front of the classroom, holding out a piece of paper rolled into the shape of a microphone, and pretending to interview Obreque. “So, what do you think of life at Fox Creek?”

Read the article

Read the article with my annotations

This month, I warmly invite you to read, annotate, and discuss “An American Education” as part of Article Club.

If you’re interested, this how things will go:

  • This week, we’ll read the article

  • Next week, we’ll annotate the article as a group

  • The following week, we’ll listen to our interview with Mr. Saslow

  • On Sunday, Nov. 20, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT, we’ll discuss the article

Sign up for the discussion!

If this will be your first time participating in Article Club, I’m 100% sure you’ll find that you’ll feel welcome. We’re a kind, thoughtful reading community. Feel free to reach out with all of your questions.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. I’d love to hear from you.

To our seven new subscribers – including Molly and Mary – I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Gary! Greg! Georgia!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Henrietta, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Here are some ways you can help out:

📬 Invite your friends. Know someone who’s kind, thoughtful, and loves to read? Share with them today’s issue and urge them to subscribe. Word of mouth is by far the best way to strengthen our reading community. Thank you very much for spreading the word.

Subscribe

☕️ Buy me a coffee to express your appreciation of the newsletter

❤️ Become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Abby and Sara (thank you!). You’ll join an esteemed group of readers who value the mission of The Highlighter Article Club. Plus you’ll receive surprise perks and prizes, including exclusive audio letters from me to you.

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#366: Gaming The Lottery

Happy Thursday, loyal readers. This week’s issue is about the lottery.

In sixth grade I won the lottery. No, it wasn’t the lottery, like Powerball or Mega Millions. But I jumped for joy nevertheless. That’s because at the end of the annual magazine drive, whereby I cajoled neighbors and family members to subscribe to People and Sports Illustrated, there was a school-wide drawing for an exciting grand prize: an Androbot Topo. And somehow, out of 600 middle schoolers (some of whom shared my enthusiasm), I won. (My mom, who volunteered for the drive, insists she played no part in my good fortune.)

It was the first and only time I’ve ever won anything. Obviously it had an effect on me, because here I am telling you this story decades later and devoting today’s newsletter to outstanding articles about lotteries.

POLL

Have you ever won a drawing, jackpot, prize, or lottery?

Yes: 54%

No: 33%

Not yet, but my luck is coming soon: 13%

Even if you’ve never struck it rich, you’ll enjoy this week’s articles, which explore lotteries from a variety of angles. You’ll meet a guy whose American dream turns into a nightmare. You’ll feel disgust that lotteries are legal in the first place. But you’ll also find yourself rooting for two elders gaming the system and taking home millions. Happy reading, and let me know which piece(s) resonate with you!

Leave a comment

1️⃣ The $30 Million Lottery Scam

Get ready for a wild ride. This is the story of Viktor Gjonaj (pronounced Joe-nye), an Albanian American real estate broker in Michigan who loves numbers. He’s convinced he can predict which four numbers will come up on the Michigan Lottery’s Daily 4, whose prize is $5,000. One time, Mr. Gjonaj showed up at the state claim office with 500 winning tickets. Then he did it again, which caught the attention of an old friend, Gregory Vitto (not Italian, despite his last name), who was down on his luck after the death of his mother. Together they won the lottery multiple times, thanks to building charts and spreadsheets, believing in bunk theorems that some numbers repeat themselves, and downing hundreds of Red Bulls to pull all-nighters (so they could talk about numbers). But one day, Mr. Vitto sensed that something didn’t quite add up, especially when Mr. Gjonaj went on a long losing streak. (31 min)

2️⃣ What We’ve Lost Playing The Lottery

Americans spend more on lottery tickets every year than on cigarettes, coffee, or smartphones, and they spend more on lottery tickets annually than on video streaming services, concert tickets, books, and movie tickets combined.

Lotteries are in our country’s DNA. They funded European settlement of the continent. Puritans condemned gambling but established their first lottery in 1745. Fancy colleges like Yale financed their construction with lottery funds. George Washington managed a lottery whose prizes included enslaved people.

Always popular, lotteries boomed starting in the 1960s, writes Kathryn Schulz in this thoughtful review of “For a Dollar and a Dream,” by the historian Jonathan D. Cohen. As America’s prosperity began to wane, politicians sought out ways to finance services without raising taxes. States like California promised huge investments in education and then reduced public funding after introducing the lottery. Sadly, instead of resulting in better infrastructure and quality of life, lotteries have accounted for just 1 percent of most state budgets. In the meantime, they’ve targeted poor Black and brown people, who spend a disproportionate percentage of their income on tickets. The solution? Ban them, says Prof. Cohen, and Ms. Schulz agrees. (17 min)

+ Ms. Schulz is one of my favorite authors — and not just because she called me an “astute reader” multiple times when I interviewed her for Article Club in February. It’s also because of “When Things Go Missing,” one of my all-time favorite pieces, and her follow-up memoir, Lost & Found, which loyal reader Carina recommends.

3️⃣ Jerry And Marge Go Large

⭐️⭐️ AN ALL-TIME FAVORITE ⭐️⭐️

Jerry and Marge Selbee are delightful retirees from down-home Michigan who have worked hard every day their whole lives to put their six kids through college. Now they’re ready to game the lottery and win millions of dollars. If you’ve ever dreamed up money-making schemes, or if you like mathematical thrillers pitting grandparents against MIT students, this one’s for you. (48 min)

+ Published in 2018, this is still one of my all-time favorite Highlighter articles. We interviewed author Jason Fagone and discussed the piece in July 2020.

+ Listen to what VIP Jessica, who recommended the article, had to say. Loyal reader Jennifer recommends the movie as well.

Thank you for reading this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. All you need to do is hit reply, email me, or leave me a voice message.

To our four new subscribers – including Kirsty, Vince, Mordy, and Piper — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Fern! Fred! Flora!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal reader Gregoro, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Invite your friends, buy me a coffee, or become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Jenn and Millie.

Subscribe

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!

#365: An interview with Mitchell S. Jackson, author of “Looking for Clarence Thomas”

I never forget how lucky I am to be doing Article Club. Not only have I met so many of you, and built a thoughtful reading community together, but I’ve also had the opportunity to interview the most talented authors out there.

Like, the most talented authors out there. (Here they are at a glance.)

This month is no exception. Some of you might say, It’s the pinnacle, actually.

That’s because Mitchell S. Jackson — the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “Twelve Minutes and a Life” (please read it if you haven’t) — generously said yes to participating in an interview about his masterful recent article, “Looking for Clarence Thomas.” We’re discussing it on Sunday, Oct. 23, 2:00 - 3:30 pm PT. Join us!

Sign up for the discussion!

What do you do when you get to talk to someone whose work you deeply admire?

In my case, I get nervous. And prepare. And re-read. And annotate. And reach out to my friend and colleague Sarai Bordeaux and ask her to join. (She said yes, too.)

But it turns out, I didn’t need to be afraid at all. Mr. Jackson was kind and gracious from the start. He laughed that I insisted on calling him Mr. Jackson. And right from the first question, everything felt natural, like we were talking to a friend rather than to a famous writer whose prose is changing the canon (Sarai’s words, and I agree!) of longform nonfiction.

We talked about a number of topics, including:

  • how he didn’t want to write about Clarence Thomas at first

  • how his trip to Pin Point inspired the piece’s opening

  • how James Baldwin’s writing helped him understand Mr. Thomas, and

  • how Mr. Thomas is a man of deep contradictions, whose time on the Supreme Court has caused “dramatically malevolent things to wide swaths of Americans”

Most of all, though, Mr. Jackson talked about the craft of writing, how if he’s going to spend months on a feature story, he wants to push himself, he wants to break convention, he wants to do something new with form.

I’m very much concerned with the sentence. I’m almost concerned with the sentence over the story. And so the benefit of writing nonfiction is that, You don’t have to invent the scenes, but the kind of ethos of wanting to make beautiful sentences, that’s really what I want to do.

I hope you take a listen, whether or not you’ve already read “Looking for Clarence Thomas.” I’d love to hear what you think of the conversation! Feel free to leave a comment here. What was thought provoking?

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading (and listening to!) this week’s issue of The Highlighter Article Club. Hope you liked it. Feel free to share your thoughts and feedback. All you need to do is hit reply, email me, or leave me a voice message.

To our five new subscribers – including Kathleen, Jess, Eve, and Roddy — I hope you find the newsletter a solid addition to your email inbox. To our long-time subscribers (Eric! Erik! Erick!), you’re pretty great, too. Loyal Reader Francis, thank you for sharing the newsletter and getting the word out.

If you like The Highlighter Article Club, please help it grow. I really appreciate your support. Invite your friends, buy me a coffee, or become a VIP member for $3 a month, like Phoebe and Laura.

Subscribe

On the other hand, if you no longer want to receive this newsletter, please feel free to unsubscribe. See you next Thursday at 9:10 am PT!